The case was seized by the parents of children who were rejected by the school in the Czech Republic because they were not vaccinated. Its cessation may dominate the debate about the means to fight Covid-19.
This is a verdict in the European vaccination campaign against Covid-19: The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) considers mandatory vaccination to be “A necessary condition in a democratic society.” It was detained by the parents of the children in the kindergarten because they were not vaccinated in the Czech Republic, so they were rejected by the kindergarten. The country must vaccinate against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus and polio.
The Supreme Court of Europe held that in its decision on Thursday, April 8th, in the Chamber of its highest authority, the obligation of vaccination does not violate the European Convention on Human Rights. “Respect the right to private life”. “The vaccination policy pursues the legitimate goal of protecting the health and legitimate rights and interests of others, because it can protect both those who receive the above-mentioned vaccines and those who cannot be vaccinated for some reason. Medical treatment.”, Recalling the verdict.The court pointed out that the latter is “Rely on collective immunization to prevent the serious infectious diseases in question”.
Czech Republic “Therefore, in this case enjoy a lot of room for appreciation”, Continue the court grand tribunal, and believe that “In all decisions that affect them, the best interests of the child must come first.”.with “Not allowing the enrolled children to enter the nursery [a] Let them lose the key opportunity to develop their personality”, This “This is a preventive measure, not a punitive measure, and its effect is limited in time”, Please judge ECHR.
The decision of the large conference hall composed of 17 European judges including the chair of ECHR is “final”. There is no recourse.
As many anti-vaccine activists have sometimes even violently demonstrated around the world, the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights resonated with special condemnation. “Health Dictatorship” Regarding the side effects of containment and preventive measures or vaccination. It may also dominate the debate on mandatory vaccination against Covid-19 (especially for medical staff).